The next Issue 1 (22) 2020 of the journal has been published!

Ukrainian (UA)English (United Kingdom)

Other Categories

Вхід / реєстрація

We are in Facebook


How did you find on our site?

Customs and trade security policy



Customs and trade security policy



Adomavičiūtė, Danutė

Бібліографічний опис:

(Bibliographic description)

Adomavičiūtė D. Customs and trade security policy [Електронний ресурс] / D. Adomavičiūtė // Соціально-економічні проблеми і держава. — 2014. — Вип. 1 (10). — С. 42-49. — Режим доступу до журн.:

Дата публікації:

(Date of publication)








Ключові слова:

(Key words)

enterprises activities’ assessment
trade security
AEO concept



Випуск 1 (10);

Короткий огляд (реферат):

(Short preview)

The aim of research is to identify the most significant and the most risky areas of the business activities’ assessment and to create a new model of the customs audit. In the article the role of customs seeking to facilitate legitimate trade has been revealed. The influence of customs on the public interests‘ protection and social as well as economic development was analysed. After analysing the customs activities monitoring and managing the international flow of goods, customs contribution ensuring the increased security of goods supply network was revealed. The concepts of the business activities’ assessment have been examined, a comparative analysis of the business activities assessment’s models has been conducted, the areas of business enterprises activities’ assessment suitable for the customs audit’s model have been identified. After studying the business enterprises activities assessment’s models and the customs audit’s models of various countries – pointing out the key areas of business activities’ assessment – a theoretically reasoned and empirically based customs audit’s model which complemented the existing customs audit’s theoretical and methodological basis has been introduced. The importance of AEO (Authorised Economic Operator) customs model – being a tool of enterprises activities’ assessment – was investigated.


(Уніфікований ідентифікатор ресурсу)
ISSN: 2223-3822

Розташовується в колекціях:

(Is situated in collections)

Журнал „Соціально-економічні проблеми і держава“, 2014, Випуск 1(10)



1. Atkinson, A. A. Strategic performance measurement and incentive compensation. European Management Journal, 1998, No. 16 (5), pp. 552–561.

2. Bento, A., White, L. An exploratory study of strategic performance measurement systems. Advences in Management Accounting, 2010, Vol. 8, pp. 1–26.

3. Bititci, U. S., Mendibil, K., Martinez, V., Albores, P. Measuring and managing performance in extended enterprises. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 2005, Vol. 25, No. 3–4, pp. 333.

4. Bourne, M., Neely, A., Platts, K., Mills, J.  The success and failure of performance measurement initiatives. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 2002, Vol. 22, No. 11, pp. 1288–1310.

5. Brown, M. G. Keeping Score: Using the Right Metrics to Drive World Class Performance. New York, Quality Resources. 1996.

6. Boguslauskas, V., Jagelavičius, G. Įmonės veiklos finansinis vertinimas. Kaunas, Technologija. 2001.

7. Bourne, M., Neely, A., Platts, K., Mills, J. The success and failure of performance measurement initiatives. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 2002, Vol. 22, No. 11, pp. 1288–1310.

8. Commission Regulation No1875/2006. European Commission, 2006.

9. Community Customs Code. Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92, European Commission, 1992, available at: :20050511:LT.

10. Deming, W. E. Out of the Crisis: Quality, Productivity and Competitive Position. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1986.

11. Ellram, L. et al. The Impact of Purchasing and Supply Management Activities on Corporate Success. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 2002, Vol. 38, No. 1, pp. 4–17.

12. Framework of standards: to secure and facilitate global trade. World customs organization, Brussels, 2005.

13. Galinienė, B. Turto ir verslo vertinimo sistema. Vilnius, Vilniaus universitetas. 2005.

14. Ganesan, S. Determinants of long-term orientation in buyer-seller relationships. Journal of Marketing, 1994, Vol. 58, No. 2, pp. 1–19.

15. Gimžauskienė, E. Valdymo apskaitos metodų adaptavimas organizacijos veiklos vertinimo procese. Daktaro disertacija. Kaunas: KTU. 2004.

16. Gutierrez, X.; Hintsa, J. Voluntary supply chain security program impacts: an empirical study with BASC member companies. University of Lausanne, 2006.

17. Halachimi, A. Performance measurement: a look at some possible dysfunctions. Work Study, 2002, Vol. 51, Iss. 5, pp. 230–239.

18. Heide, J. B., John, G. Alliances in industrial purchasing: the determinants of joint action in buyer-supplier relationship. Journal of Marketing Research, 1990, Vol. 27, No. 1, p. 24–36.

19. Hendrick, T., Ellram, L. Strategic Supplier Partnering: An International Study, Center for Advanced Purchasing Studies. 1993.

20. Kaplan, R. S., Norton, D. P. Using the balanced scorecard as a strategic management system. Harvard Business Review, 1996, Vol. 74, No. 1, pp. 20–25.

21. Kaplan, R. S., Norton, D. P. The Strategy-Focused Organization: How Balanced Scorecard Companies Thrive in the New Business Environment. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press, 2001.

22. Keegan, D. P., Eiler, R. G., Jones, C. R. Are your performance measures obsolete? Management Accounting, 1989, No. 70 (12), pp. 45–50.

23. Lambert, D. M., Emmelhainz, M. A., Gardner, J. T. Developing and implementing supply chain partnerships. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 1996, Vol. 7, No. 2, pp. 1–17.

24. Liebowitz, B. The Evidence So Far and What It Means for the Future. 2004, available at:

25. Lynch, R. L., Cross, K. F. Measure Up – Yardsticks for Continuous Improvement. Cambridge MA, Blackwell Publishers, 1991.

26. Marr, B., Schiuma, G. Business performance measurement: past, present, and future. Management Decision, 2003, Vol. 41, No. 8, pp. 680.

27. Morgan, C. Supply network performance measurement: future challenges? The International Journal of Logistics Management, 2007, Vol. 18, No. 2, pp. 255–273, available at:

28. Morgan, C., Dewhurst, A. Multiple retailers supplier performance: an exploratory investigation into using SPC techniques. International Journal of Production Economics, 2007, Vol. 109, No. 1–2.

29. Pearson, J. N., Carter, J. R., Peng, L. Alliances, logistics barriers, and strategic actions in the People's Republic of China. International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 1998, Vol. 34, No. 4, pp. 27–36.

30. Pongatichat, P., Johnston, R. Exploring strategy-misaligned performance measurement. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 2008, Vol. 57, Iss. 3, pp. 207–222, available at:

31. Regulation (EC) No 648/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 April 2005, amending Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 establishing the Community Customs Code, OJ L 117 of 04/05/05.

32. Ruka declaration on the Future of Customs 2013–2020 m. European Commission, High level seminar on the Future of Customs, 4–5 February, 2010, Ruka.

33. Rupšys, R. Vidaus audito veiklos vertinimo modelis. Daktaro disertacija. Kaunas, Technologija. 2008.

34. Saiz, J., Bas, A., Rodríguez, R. Performance measurement system for enterprise networks. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 2007, Vol. 56, Iss. 4, p. 305–334, available at:

35. Slatkevičienė, G., Vanagas, P. Veiklos kompleksinio vertinimo sistema: sudarymo teorija ir metodai. Kaunas, Technologija, 2001.

36. Vidickienė, D. Įmonės veiklos vertinimo sistema. Vilnius, Vilniaus universitetas, 2004.

37. Whipple, J. S; Gentry, J. J. A network comparison of alliance motives and achievements. The Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 2000, Vol. 15, No. 5, pp. 301.


Journal is indexed by:


Other useful links:
Пошук у EBSCO

Google translate

Ukrainian English French German Polish Russian