Functional mechanisms of united territorial communities as paradigms of communities

KUZ, Tetiana
MALIUTA, Liudmyla
HAHALIUK, Olha

Ternopil Ivan Puluj National Technical University, 56 Ruska str., 46001, Ternopil, Ukraine

Kuz, T., Maliuta, L. & Hahaliuk, O. (2021) Funktsionalni mekhanizmy obiednanykh terytorialnykh hromad u konteksti rozghliadu paradyhmy spilnot [Functional mechanisms of united territorial communities as paradigms of communities]. Sotsialno-ekonomichni problemy i derzhava [Socio- Economic Problems and the State] (electronic journal), Vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 594-601. Available at: http://sepd.tntu.edu.ua/images/stories/pdf/2021/21ktirps.pdf

Socio-Economic Problems and the State

2(25)

Nov-2021

Oct-2021

6-Oct-2022

Ternopil Ivan Puluj National Technical University

UA

Ternopil

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0977-7329

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7569-9982

https://doi.org/10.33108/sepd2022.02.594

338.1

O15
O15
R1

territorial community
paradigm
anomaly
crisis
revolutions
states of development (previous, ordinary and subsequent states).

8

594-601

594

601

In this article, the authors propose an idea based on the interpretation of the functional mechanisms of united territorial communities considering Kuhn's interpretation of the scientific communities’ paradigms in the way that community paradigms should be interpreted as general theoretical assumptions and laws and means of their implementation which the scientific community members use. This forms and develops paradigms with its activities. That is, each community has its own paradigms, which include the established system and customs, as well as recorded standards, condemnations, dogmas, historical experience, as well as the actual situation and common goals. According to the author, a territorial community is a human association that is associated with self-organizing territories, a sequence of timely states called processes. It follows that the territorial community is a process. The paradigmatic stages of development of united territorial communities as a process that has a beginning, evolution and termination or end point are proposed. Differences between territorial, scientific or religious communities are determined, where the author states that the main difference is in paradigms and direction of their goals. It is stated what changes and crises in paradigms mean. Thus, changes are not independent events, but long episodes with regular repetitive structures. Crises – crises are the stage of change that follows discovery. As long as the methods (or tools) of the paradigm are able to solve certain problems or issues, the community develops effectively. Also in the article, the author takes the position that territorial communities are processes that cannot be controlled by elected or hired leaders, but which are controlled (influenced) by community paradigms, which, in turn, are constantly changing. Based on the position of the author and the context of territorial communities, the paradigm can be explained as follows: the paradigm is a "certain way of seeing the world", which was once accepted by many scientists, creates a community of these scientists; or a religious community of believers; or a territorial community from people living in a certain area. the paradigms of territorial communities determine the important objects with which the community cooperates and the related problems, and / or the issues that are identified, and the methods by which the identified problems and / or issues are resolved.

http://elartu.tntu.edu.ua/handle/lib/38865

2223-3822

http://sepd.tntu.edu.ua/images/stories/pdf/2021/21ktirps.pdf
http://sepd.tntu.edu. ua/images/stories/pdf/ 2020/20ktisvu.pdf.
https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/333-2014-%D1%80#Text
https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/280/97-%D0%B2%D1%80#Text.

1. Andrushkiv B. M., Kyrych N. B., Maljuta L. Ja., Meljnyk Gh. Kh. ta in. (2017) Strateghija rozvytku administratyvnogho rajonu (Konceptualjni zasady orghanizaciji socialjno-ekonomichnogho rozvytku administratyvnogho rajonu v konteksti formuvannja dobroviljnykh objednanj terytorialjnykh ghromad Lanovechchyny) [Strategy of development of the administrative district (Conceptual bases of the organization of social and economic development of the administrative district in the context of formation of voluntary associations of territorial communities of Lanovechchyna).]. Ternopilj : FOP Paljanycja V. A.
2. Ghrushevsjkyj M. S. (1992) Iljustrovana istorija Ukrajiny. [Illustrated history of Ukraine] K.: Nauk. Dumka.
3. Encyklopedija derzhavnogho upravlinnja (2011) [Encyclopedia of Public Administration] : u 8 t. / Nac. akad. derzh. upr. pry Prezydentovi Ukrajiny ; nauk.-red. koleghija : Ju. V. Kovbasjuk (gholova) ta in. K. : NADU, 2011. T. 1 : Teorija derzhavnogho upravlinnja / nauk.-red. koleghija : V. M. Knjazjev (spivgholova), I. V. Rozputenko (spivgholova) ta in.
4. Kuz T. (2020) Formuvannja terytorialjnykh ghromad jak bazovogho elementu systemy miscevogho samovrjaduvannja v Ukrajini [Formation of territorial communities as a basic element of the system of local self-government in Ukraine]. Socialjno-ekonomichni problemy i derzhava. Vyp. 1 (22). https://doi.org/10.33108/sepd2020.01.048
5. Pro skhvalennja Koncepciji reformuvannja miscevogho samovrjaduvannja ta terytorialjnoji orghanizaciji vlady v Ukrajini [On approval of the Concept of reforming local self-government and territorial organization of power in Ukraine]: Rozporjadzhennja Kabinetu Ministriv Ukrajiny vid 01 kvitnja 2014 roku # 333-2014 r. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/333-2014-%D1%80#Text (accessed: 12 June 2021)
6. Pro misceve samovrjaduvannja v ukrajini [On local self-government in Ukraine] : Zakon Ukrajiny vid 21 travnja 1997 roku # 280/97 vr. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/280/97-%D0%B2%D1%80#Text. (accessed:: 12 June 2021)
7. Cherkasjkyj I. (1928). Ghromadsjkyj (kopnyj) sud na Ukrajini - Rusi KhVI–KhVIII st. : praci komisiji dlja vyuchuvannja istoriji zakhidnjorusjkogho ta vkrajinsjkogho prava [Public (mining) court in Ukraine - Russia XVI-XVIII centuries. : works of the commission for studying the history of Western Russian and Ukrainian law.] Vyp. 4 : za red. N. P. Vasylenka. Zbirnyk socialjnoekonomichnogho viddilu Ukrajinsjkoji akademiji nauk.
8. Blackburn, S. (2002). The Oxford Dictionary of Philosophy. Tallinn: Vagabund.
9. Kuhn, T. S. (1962) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Article

Scientific Journal "Socio-Economic Problems and the State" Vol 2(25)